page-loading-spinner
Home Why Didn’t The Regulators See This?
Health
PEAK INSIGHTS

Why Didn’t The Regulators See This?

Episode 99 Part 1

user profile picture Chris Martenson Feb 28, 2023
71 32
placeholder image
Looking for part 2?

The covid vaccine safety data collected by Pfizer and submitted to US, Australian and European regulators are packed with an unacceptable amount and variety of obvious vaccine-related concerns and probable harms.  It screams “disaster!”  These un-safety reports should have immediately led to the cessation of the shots or, at a minimum, kicked off deep inquiries […]

View part 2

The covid vaccine safety data collected by Pfizer and submitted to US, Australian and European regulators are packed with an unacceptable amount and variety of obvious vaccine-related concerns and probable harms.  It screams “disaster!”  These un-safety reports should have immediately led to the cessation of the shots or, at a minimum, kicked off deep inquiries into the signals to either rule them in or out.

Neither were done.

Instead, Pfizer captured these harms, packaged them as unhelpfully or even outright confusingly as they could, and then declared there were “no safety signals of concern” – a mantra which was parroted and repeated by the health authorities on all three continents.   These were complete lies and people were harmed, and many died.

The consequences should be severe for all involved.

For example,  note here in the EU safety document on page 240 they have a table relating the experience of one of the precious few clinical trials actually conducted on the Pfizer vaccine.  In this trial, out of 22 pregnancy cases, when women were given the experimental injection after the 1st trimester, out of 8 cases 5 of them resulted in a live birth with a congenital abnormality.

And we might also note that 9 out of 11 pregnant women exposed during the 1st trimester “spontaneously aborted.”

This is alarming, to say the least.  It should have been investigated further.  It deserves a robust inquiry and explanation – at the very least.

Nothing of the sort was done.  Instead, the section in which this table is found concludes:

Case closed!  I guess everything is fine because Pfizer said so!  /s

Now, it’s entirely possible that this was a case of bad luck, of random chance. Or it could have been a glaring safety signal of the worst sort.  The point is Pfizer was simply allowed to declare – to assert – it wasn’t a safety signal at all and the regulators went along with it.  That’s not how any of this is supposed to work.

It didn’t have to be this way.  It shouldn’t have been this way.



Watch the Video
Listen to the Audio

Click Here to Download

Read the Full Transcript!

Peak Insights Episode 99 Part 1

Looking for part 2?

The covid vaccine safety data collected by Pfizer and submitted to US, Australian and European regulators are packed with an unacceptable amount and variety of obvious vaccine-related concerns and probable harms.  It screams “disaster!”  These un-safety reports should have immediately led to the cessation of the shots or, at a minimum, kicked off deep inquiries […]

View part 2
5 6 votes
Content Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Collapse all threads
32
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x