page-loading-spinner

Podcast

by Chris Martenson

On June 28th 2017, the United States Congress held a hearing titled: “The Federal Reserve’s Impact on Main Street, Retirees and Savings.” If you haven't watched it yet, we highly recommend doing so.

Joining us for today's podcast is Alex J. Pollock, one of the experts who participated on that Congressional panel. In this discussion, he details out his assessments of the Fed's major transgressions against the interests of the general public. But perhaps more interestingly, he shares his observations from the hearing and how it struck him that many of the members of Congress that convened it appear to be growing increasingly concerned about the Fed's lack of accountability, as well as its potential fallibility.

Alex J. Pollock: Insights From The Recent Congressional Hearing On The Fed
by Chris Martenson

On June 28th 2017, the United States Congress held a hearing titled: “The Federal Reserve’s Impact on Main Street, Retirees and Savings.” If you haven't watched it yet, we highly recommend doing so.

Joining us for today's podcast is Alex J. Pollock, one of the experts who participated on that Congressional panel. In this discussion, he details out his assessments of the Fed's major transgressions against the interests of the general public. But perhaps more interestingly, he shares his observations from the hearing and how it struck him that many of the members of Congress that convened it appear to be growing increasingly concerned about the Fed's lack of accountability, as well as its potential fallibility.

by Chris Martenson

Executive Summary

  • The dangerous shortcomings of the world's dominant 'Neoclassical' economic models
  • The predictive advantage of understanding the Overton Window
  • The alternative (and very likely better) models of Keen and Minsky
  • The critical improvement to ALL models of tying economics to energy/resources

If you have not yet read Part 1: Bad Models Result In Terrible Outcomes available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

So let’s see if we can understand the model errors for the central banks.  Again this is important because if they’ve got it wrong, then we all will pay a very heavy price — with Venezuela, Argentina, and Zimbabwe all providing vivid examples of what happens when the social contract of money is ruined.  

To begin, the current crop of monetary practitioners at the world’s central banks are all devotees and advocates of the neoclassical branch of economics.  It’s an odd dogma for them to hold because its track record at explaining or predicting what has either happened or might yet happen is utterly dismal.

As Steve Keen explains:

[Economics as understood by the central bankers] has always been grounded in the beliefs that (a) capitalism is inherently stable, (b) that the financial sector can be ignored—yes that’s right, ignored—when doing macroeconomics, and (c) that the Great Depression was an anomaly that can also be ignored, because it can only have been caused either by an exogenous shock or bad government policy, both of which cannot be predicted in advance.

(Source)

The main flaw in the neoclassical approach to economics is that it completely ignores, or rather assumes away, any and all trends in debt creation.  In this bizarrely incomplete system of thinking, the financial system is considered to be, essentially, a self-correcting zero-sum entity (that balances itself out nicely with a little help now and then). 

So such things as carefully tracking GDP increase per new unit of debt, overall indebtedness ratios and understanding that crises are bred from complacency are of no practical concern to a neoclassical economist, such as those fully occupying the halls of power currently.

One way to understand the dogma that infects the central banking halls of power lies in what Jim Kunstler recently surfaced in a piece he wrote on the Overton Window, which, importantly…

A Better Model For Predicting What Happens Next
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson

Executive Summary

  • The dangerous shortcomings of the world's dominant 'Neoclassical' economic models
  • The predictive advantage of understanding the Overton Window
  • The alternative (and very likely better) models of Keen and Minsky
  • The critical improvement to ALL models of tying economics to energy/resources

If you have not yet read Part 1: Bad Models Result In Terrible Outcomes available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

So let’s see if we can understand the model errors for the central banks.  Again this is important because if they’ve got it wrong, then we all will pay a very heavy price — with Venezuela, Argentina, and Zimbabwe all providing vivid examples of what happens when the social contract of money is ruined.  

To begin, the current crop of monetary practitioners at the world’s central banks are all devotees and advocates of the neoclassical branch of economics.  It’s an odd dogma for them to hold because its track record at explaining or predicting what has either happened or might yet happen is utterly dismal.

As Steve Keen explains:

[Economics as understood by the central bankers] has always been grounded in the beliefs that (a) capitalism is inherently stable, (b) that the financial sector can be ignored—yes that’s right, ignored—when doing macroeconomics, and (c) that the Great Depression was an anomaly that can also be ignored, because it can only have been caused either by an exogenous shock or bad government policy, both of which cannot be predicted in advance.

(Source)

The main flaw in the neoclassical approach to economics is that it completely ignores, or rather assumes away, any and all trends in debt creation.  In this bizarrely incomplete system of thinking, the financial system is considered to be, essentially, a self-correcting zero-sum entity (that balances itself out nicely with a little help now and then). 

So such things as carefully tracking GDP increase per new unit of debt, overall indebtedness ratios and understanding that crises are bred from complacency are of no practical concern to a neoclassical economist, such as those fully occupying the halls of power currently.

One way to understand the dogma that infects the central banking halls of power lies in what Jim Kunstler recently surfaced in a piece he wrote on the Overton Window, which, importantly…

by Chris Martenson

Following up on our recent warning about the situation in Syria, Chris sits down this week for a conversation with The Saker, who writes extensively on geo-political and military matters. The Saker (a nom-de-plume), is a former intelligence expert with professional and personal insights into Russia and the Middle East.

He shares our deep concern for the dangerously misdirected current state of US foreign and military policy, as well as the potentially lethal repercussions these threaten to have in the powderkeg that is Syria.

In this week's podcast, The Saker provides an excellent distillation of the complex forces in play in Syria — as well as in the brewing friction between the US and Russia — and why the risk of nuclear war has now grown higher than it has been in decades.

The Saker: The Syrian Powderkeg
by Chris Martenson

Following up on our recent warning about the situation in Syria, Chris sits down this week for a conversation with The Saker, who writes extensively on geo-political and military matters. The Saker (a nom-de-plume), is a former intelligence expert with professional and personal insights into Russia and the Middle East.

He shares our deep concern for the dangerously misdirected current state of US foreign and military policy, as well as the potentially lethal repercussions these threaten to have in the powderkeg that is Syria.

In this week's podcast, The Saker provides an excellent distillation of the complex forces in play in Syria — as well as in the brewing friction between the US and Russia — and why the risk of nuclear war has now grown higher than it has been in decades.

by charleshughsmith

Executive Summary

  • Why we can cut energy consumption by 50% and still function
  • Why new systems of work, income & resource distribution are needed
  • The need for a new type of currency that can't be manipulated by the elites
  • The need for de-centralized governance & processes

If you have not yet read Part 1: The Inevitability Of DeGrowth available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

In Part 1, we surveyed the fundamental dynamic of the present-day status quo, which is fatally dependent on expanding debt, energy consumption per capita, income and consumption of goods and services. Once debt and/or energy expansion stalls, the status quo collapses.

Which brings us to the question: what sort of economy could we have that consumes less energy every year and distributes resources to the populace in some sort of stable, reasonably just arrangement?

We can imagine a variety of unjust repressive regimes that hoard whatever energy and goodies are available for the ruling elites, and there are any number of dystopian films depicting a chaotic endless-war-anarchy scenario of ruthlessly Darwinian distribution systems ( “my lead takes your gold,” etc.).

But neither of these possibilities are set in stone. We could consciously choose to pursue DeGrowth, a set of guiding principles orbiting one basic idea: using less is not a bad thing, it’s a good thing, and it could be coupled with improvements in our quality of life.

Here in Part 2, we provide the blueprint for a DeGrowth Economy.

What Is DeGrowth?

These are the basic concepts of DeGrowth…

A Blueprint For DeGrowth
PREVIEW by charleshughsmith

Executive Summary

  • Why we can cut energy consumption by 50% and still function
  • Why new systems of work, income & resource distribution are needed
  • The need for a new type of currency that can't be manipulated by the elites
  • The need for de-centralized governance & processes

If you have not yet read Part 1: The Inevitability Of DeGrowth available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

In Part 1, we surveyed the fundamental dynamic of the present-day status quo, which is fatally dependent on expanding debt, energy consumption per capita, income and consumption of goods and services. Once debt and/or energy expansion stalls, the status quo collapses.

Which brings us to the question: what sort of economy could we have that consumes less energy every year and distributes resources to the populace in some sort of stable, reasonably just arrangement?

We can imagine a variety of unjust repressive regimes that hoard whatever energy and goodies are available for the ruling elites, and there are any number of dystopian films depicting a chaotic endless-war-anarchy scenario of ruthlessly Darwinian distribution systems ( “my lead takes your gold,” etc.).

But neither of these possibilities are set in stone. We could consciously choose to pursue DeGrowth, a set of guiding principles orbiting one basic idea: using less is not a bad thing, it’s a good thing, and it could be coupled with improvements in our quality of life.

Here in Part 2, we provide the blueprint for a DeGrowth Economy.

What Is DeGrowth?

These are the basic concepts of DeGrowth…

Total 6359 items

Daily Digest

Please login to submit a story to the Daily Digest.

View Past Daily Digests