page-loading-spinner
Home Geopolitics

Geopolitics

by Gregor Macdonald

How the European Endgame Will Be the Death Knell For Modern Economics

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Monday, December 5, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Central banks are running out of options, leaving only increasingly desperate choices
  • Why Europe is most likely to begrudgingly print a whole lot more money soon
  • The harsh judgment day is approaching for mainstream economists
  • Why 2012 heralds the dawn of a new era of economic understanding

Part I: It’s Time To Give Up On Mainstream Economics

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II: How the European Endgame Will Be the Death Knell For Modern Central Banking

Central Banks Becoming Increasingly Desperate

Has Europe decided to print its way out of the crisis? The big-bang announcement last week among global central banks suggests as much. Unfortunately, the global US dollar swap solution only patches up the liquidity portion of Europe’s present dilemma and does nothing to address the solvency issue.

As readers know, I take the mildly heretical view that “money-printing” in our present debt deflation actually functions as a status-quo maintainer. It does not risk hyperinflation, but instead keeps social confidence intact — at low levels, of course — as the familiar institutions of Western economies are maintained. Hard defaults, on the other hand, especially hard defaults that appear out of the hands of either fiscal or monetary policy makers, risk a confidence collapse on a large scale.

In my view, hyperinflation typically begins with a broad rejection of a country’s sovereign debt. This is the initial threshold that is crossed on the path to currency rejection, as foreign holders exit first. Domestic institutions are more restricted, slower to react, often bound by investment mandates, and thus left “holding the bag,” as it were, on a country’s bonds. Eventually, domestic confidence in the currency itself is lost, as the public, having watched its institutions fail, rejects the currency.

In my view, Europe is still at very high risk for such a catastrophic outcome. No global central bank, including the European Central Bank (ECB), can change the fact that the debt of Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Italy cannot be supported realistically through economic growth. But there is still time for the ECB to change its charter and buy that debt. The coordinated central-bank actions this past week will have virtually no consequence unless the ECB conducts QE (quantitative easing) on a massive scale.

Probabilistically, I have to favor the idea that Europe was given the lifeline on the condition that the fiscal union discussed in Europe and the permission granted to the ECB to conduct QE are both forthcoming. For the sake of social stability, I hope this happens. But I am not naive. Much of the debt that the ECB would purchase under such a regime, just like much of the junk debt now on the Fed’s balance sheet, will never recover its par (full price) value. Certainly not in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. But if the ECB does not “print money,” then we will move directly to hard defaults. And the hyperinflation risk that is currently masked by the common currency to the Eurozone will eventually be unveiled.

How the European Endgame Will Be the Death Knell For Modern Economics
PREVIEW by Gregor Macdonald

How the European Endgame Will Be the Death Knell For Modern Economics

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Monday, December 5, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Central banks are running out of options, leaving only increasingly desperate choices
  • Why Europe is most likely to begrudgingly print a whole lot more money soon
  • The harsh judgment day is approaching for mainstream economists
  • Why 2012 heralds the dawn of a new era of economic understanding

Part I: It’s Time To Give Up On Mainstream Economics

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II: How the European Endgame Will Be the Death Knell For Modern Central Banking

Central Banks Becoming Increasingly Desperate

Has Europe decided to print its way out of the crisis? The big-bang announcement last week among global central banks suggests as much. Unfortunately, the global US dollar swap solution only patches up the liquidity portion of Europe’s present dilemma and does nothing to address the solvency issue.

As readers know, I take the mildly heretical view that “money-printing” in our present debt deflation actually functions as a status-quo maintainer. It does not risk hyperinflation, but instead keeps social confidence intact — at low levels, of course — as the familiar institutions of Western economies are maintained. Hard defaults, on the other hand, especially hard defaults that appear out of the hands of either fiscal or monetary policy makers, risk a confidence collapse on a large scale.

In my view, hyperinflation typically begins with a broad rejection of a country’s sovereign debt. This is the initial threshold that is crossed on the path to currency rejection, as foreign holders exit first. Domestic institutions are more restricted, slower to react, often bound by investment mandates, and thus left “holding the bag,” as it were, on a country’s bonds. Eventually, domestic confidence in the currency itself is lost, as the public, having watched its institutions fail, rejects the currency.

In my view, Europe is still at very high risk for such a catastrophic outcome. No global central bank, including the European Central Bank (ECB), can change the fact that the debt of Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Italy cannot be supported realistically through economic growth. But there is still time for the ECB to change its charter and buy that debt. The coordinated central-bank actions this past week will have virtually no consequence unless the ECB conducts QE (quantitative easing) on a massive scale.

Probabilistically, I have to favor the idea that Europe was given the lifeline on the condition that the fiscal union discussed in Europe and the permission granted to the ECB to conduct QE are both forthcoming. For the sake of social stability, I hope this happens. But I am not naive. Much of the debt that the ECB would purchase under such a regime, just like much of the junk debt now on the Fed’s balance sheet, will never recover its par (full price) value. Certainly not in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. But if the ECB does not “print money,” then we will move directly to hard defaults. And the hyperinflation risk that is currently masked by the common currency to the Eurozone will eventually be unveiled.

by Chris Martenson

Growth and the Upcoming Iranian War


Monday, July 12, 2010

Executive Summary



  • A war with Iran seems likely before the US elections in November.

  • The US has committed an act of war in deciding to embargo Iranian fuel shipments and international financial activities.

  • The “urgency for dealing with Iran” is driven more by oil competition than military crisis.

  • The US militarily occupies or diplomatically controls every strategically-located oil producer in the Middle East except for Iran.

  • The most probable explanation for the sudden concern about Iran is likely centered over energy and the ‘requirement’ of growth that our economic and financial systems demand.

  • Seeking militarily-secured access to oil halfway around the world is a weak strategy.

  • An Iranian war has the potential to severely disrupt developed economies due to another wild oil-price spike.

I am troubled by the renewed beating of the Iranian war drums by the West and Israel.  Troubled, in part, because the world economy needs a war with Iran right now like it needs a hole in the head.  Or perhaps I should say a hole in the barrel, because the most likely immediate outcome of an Iranian war would be a diminution of oil traversing out of the Persian Gulf and a gigantic leap in the price of oil.


Both would add terrible stresses to the global financial system at this particular moment.


The last time I wrote about the urgent beating of the Iranian war drums was in December of 2009.  Then, too, we saw a near-perfect coordination of the media in breathlessly “reporting” whatever the US and Israeli military elements wanted communicated.  Basically it boiled down to something like this:  “THE US MUST IMMEDIATELY DEAL WITH THIS URGENT THREAT RIGHT NOW – NO WAITING – IT IS THAT SERIOUS!!!”  Sorry for shouting there, but that’s how it came across to me before it all, oddly and quietly, slipped off of the headlines and out of our collective consciousness, until just recently.

Growth and the Upcoming Iranian War
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson

Growth and the Upcoming Iranian War


Monday, July 12, 2010

Executive Summary



  • A war with Iran seems likely before the US elections in November.

  • The US has committed an act of war in deciding to embargo Iranian fuel shipments and international financial activities.

  • The “urgency for dealing with Iran” is driven more by oil competition than military crisis.

  • The US militarily occupies or diplomatically controls every strategically-located oil producer in the Middle East except for Iran.

  • The most probable explanation for the sudden concern about Iran is likely centered over energy and the ‘requirement’ of growth that our economic and financial systems demand.

  • Seeking militarily-secured access to oil halfway around the world is a weak strategy.

  • An Iranian war has the potential to severely disrupt developed economies due to another wild oil-price spike.

I am troubled by the renewed beating of the Iranian war drums by the West and Israel.  Troubled, in part, because the world economy needs a war with Iran right now like it needs a hole in the head.  Or perhaps I should say a hole in the barrel, because the most likely immediate outcome of an Iranian war would be a diminution of oil traversing out of the Persian Gulf and a gigantic leap in the price of oil.


Both would add terrible stresses to the global financial system at this particular moment.


The last time I wrote about the urgent beating of the Iranian war drums was in December of 2009.  Then, too, we saw a near-perfect coordination of the media in breathlessly “reporting” whatever the US and Israeli military elements wanted communicated.  Basically it boiled down to something like this:  “THE US MUST IMMEDIATELY DEAL WITH THIS URGENT THREAT RIGHT NOW – NO WAITING – IT IS THAT SERIOUS!!!”  Sorry for shouting there, but that’s how it came across to me before it all, oddly and quietly, slipped off of the headlines and out of our collective consciousness, until just recently.

Total 1456 items