page-loading-spinner
Home Economy

Economy

by Chris Martenson

As part of our continuing series on “why things will proceed until the break,” we have this delightful article from the Washington Post, trumpeting the ‘findings’ of a study by a think tank representing the views of public employees that – surprise! – concluded that a “massive” hiring binge is required.

The think tank in question, the Partnership for Public Service, was founded in 2001 by a corporate raider, Samuel Heyman, who apparently has a passion for corporate governance as well as public government.

This is exactly the sort of article that the Washington Post loves to run – one that unabashedly calls for growth in the size and scope of government.  Nowhere in the article will you find a countervailing point of view that might dare to suggest it is large enough already, let alone a voice (like mine) that would claim it’s too large.

Federal Government Needs Massive Hiring Binge, Study Finds
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson

As part of our continuing series on “why things will proceed until the break,” we have this delightful article from the Washington Post, trumpeting the ‘findings’ of a study by a think tank representing the views of public employees that – surprise! – concluded that a “massive” hiring binge is required.

The think tank in question, the Partnership for Public Service, was founded in 2001 by a corporate raider, Samuel Heyman, who apparently has a passion for corporate governance as well as public government.

This is exactly the sort of article that the Washington Post loves to run – one that unabashedly calls for growth in the size and scope of government.  Nowhere in the article will you find a countervailing point of view that might dare to suggest it is large enough already, let alone a voice (like mine) that would claim it’s too large.

by Chris Martenson

In this post, I respond to the recent flurry of activity in print and in blogs about the dollar, US indebtedness, and the risks associated with both.

Mish recently posted a mixed grab-bag entitled Countdown To Dollar Implosion Madness, in which he (very rightly, in my view) took to task various bloggers and other Internet sources that have been peddling rumors of bank holidays and setting specific dates for a dollar implosion.

I don’t like trading in unsourced rumors, either by the mainstream media or by bloggers (as they are very nearly always proven wrong), and I am especially leery of setting dates for future market events.  So kudos to Mish for his efforts to hold bloggers to a higher standard.

However, I took exception to a snippet from a WSJ article by Andrew Batson, entitled Households Start to Rival the Chinese in Treasury Market (originally blogged about by Michael Pettis here), that offered the comforting impression that domestic savings are growing and are possibly sufficient to fund the US government deficit.

A Dollar Crisis in the Making
by Chris Martenson

In this post, I respond to the recent flurry of activity in print and in blogs about the dollar, US indebtedness, and the risks associated with both.

Mish recently posted a mixed grab-bag entitled Countdown To Dollar Implosion Madness, in which he (very rightly, in my view) took to task various bloggers and other Internet sources that have been peddling rumors of bank holidays and setting specific dates for a dollar implosion.

I don’t like trading in unsourced rumors, either by the mainstream media or by bloggers (as they are very nearly always proven wrong), and I am especially leery of setting dates for future market events.  So kudos to Mish for his efforts to hold bloggers to a higher standard.

However, I took exception to a snippet from a WSJ article by Andrew Batson, entitled Households Start to Rival the Chinese in Treasury Market (originally blogged about by Michael Pettis here), that offered the comforting impression that domestic savings are growing and are possibly sufficient to fund the US government deficit.

by Chris Martenson

Over at The Big Picture, Barry Ritholtz’ excellent blog, he’s got a list of the top bank holding companies, sorted by their Commercial Real Estate (CRE) loans.

There are a couple of shocking things on that list. The first is the level of concentration of holdings by those at the top of the list. Wells Fargo, for instance, at the top of the list, holds some $88 billion in CRE loans, or 50% more than the next bank on the list.

Next is the degree to which most banks aggressively expanded their CRE loans over the past year by 10%, 20%, even 40% and more. Wait, what? Does that seem a prudent thing to do over this past year?

At any rate, here’s the list:

Concentrated Risk – CRE loans and Bank Holding Companies
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson

Over at The Big Picture, Barry Ritholtz’ excellent blog, he’s got a list of the top bank holding companies, sorted by their Commercial Real Estate (CRE) loans.

There are a couple of shocking things on that list. The first is the level of concentration of holdings by those at the top of the list. Wells Fargo, for instance, at the top of the list, holds some $88 billion in CRE loans, or 50% more than the next bank on the list.

Next is the degree to which most banks aggressively expanded their CRE loans over the past year by 10%, 20%, even 40% and more. Wait, what? Does that seem a prudent thing to do over this past year?

At any rate, here’s the list:

Total 3441 items