page-loading-spinner
Home Economy

Economy

by charleshughsmith

The Transition to a Post-Friction Economy

by Charles Hugh Smith, contributing editor
Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Entrenched interests keep our markets from being free
  • We’re living in a fool’s paradise (but for how much longer?)
  • The forced choices headed our way
  • What the post-friction economy will look like
  • 2012-2105: The Era of Transformation begins

Part I – How Much of the US Economy Is Friction

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – The Transition to a Post-Friction Economy

In Part I, we pursued the idea that much of the US economy is, in essence, unproductive friction that is overcome with vast borrowing — itself a form of friction — and the importing of fossil fuels. We also noted that the Central State/cartel “capitalism” partnership has greatly expanded the unproductive, uncompetitive “friction” segments of the economy and has limited consumer “choice” to purposely-selected menus designed to appear like a “free market” while benefiting State fiefdoms and private-sector cartels.

Entrenched Interests Keep Our Markets From Being Free

Looking at the sources and costs of friction gives us some insight into issues that are often seen as political — for example, the costs and benefits of borrowing trillions of dollars into existence every year and the costs/benefits of State regulation. Once we recognize how rising systemic friction will eventually freeze the system, then we also recognize that the path we’re on is unsustainable, and the political “rightness” or “wrongness” of increasing debt to fund the forces of friction becomes irrelevant.

The same can be said of State regulation. Given that one of the purposes of government is to protect the nation’s “commons” — air, water, public lands, and other shared resources — then some regulation is necessary to limit exploitation and predation of the commons by either private parties or the State itself. 

But we have confused productive regulation with regulation that achieves little beyond diverting funds to unproductive segments of the economy. There are hundreds, if not thousands of examples in every sector from criminal justice to farm subsidies to health care.

How about the enormous expense of the “war on drugs” and the resulting prison complex and criminal justice system? Are the benefits being reaped — marginal, or even counterproductive, in many analyses — worth the expense? Those employed in these systems naturally feel the benefits far exceed the costs. But self-interest is simply not an accurate measure of friction; ultimately, only a free market of free citizens can make that assessment.

The Transition to a Post-Friction Economy
PREVIEW by charleshughsmith

The Transition to a Post-Friction Economy

by Charles Hugh Smith, contributing editor
Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Entrenched interests keep our markets from being free
  • We’re living in a fool’s paradise (but for how much longer?)
  • The forced choices headed our way
  • What the post-friction economy will look like
  • 2012-2105: The Era of Transformation begins

Part I – How Much of the US Economy Is Friction

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – The Transition to a Post-Friction Economy

In Part I, we pursued the idea that much of the US economy is, in essence, unproductive friction that is overcome with vast borrowing — itself a form of friction — and the importing of fossil fuels. We also noted that the Central State/cartel “capitalism” partnership has greatly expanded the unproductive, uncompetitive “friction” segments of the economy and has limited consumer “choice” to purposely-selected menus designed to appear like a “free market” while benefiting State fiefdoms and private-sector cartels.

Entrenched Interests Keep Our Markets From Being Free

Looking at the sources and costs of friction gives us some insight into issues that are often seen as political — for example, the costs and benefits of borrowing trillions of dollars into existence every year and the costs/benefits of State regulation. Once we recognize how rising systemic friction will eventually freeze the system, then we also recognize that the path we’re on is unsustainable, and the political “rightness” or “wrongness” of increasing debt to fund the forces of friction becomes irrelevant.

The same can be said of State regulation. Given that one of the purposes of government is to protect the nation’s “commons” — air, water, public lands, and other shared resources — then some regulation is necessary to limit exploitation and predation of the commons by either private parties or the State itself. 

But we have confused productive regulation with regulation that achieves little beyond diverting funds to unproductive segments of the economy. There are hundreds, if not thousands of examples in every sector from criminal justice to farm subsidies to health care.

How about the enormous expense of the “war on drugs” and the resulting prison complex and criminal justice system? Are the benefits being reaped — marginal, or even counterproductive, in many analyses — worth the expense? Those employed in these systems naturally feel the benefits far exceed the costs. But self-interest is simply not an accurate measure of friction; ultimately, only a free market of free citizens can make that assessment.

by Adam Taggart

What do you get when the producer of the world's reserve currency takes on too much debt? Nothing less than the end of the US Treasury-based monetary system.

So says Eric Janszen, economic and financial market analyst and proprietor of iTulip.com. In chronicling the decline of the global economy over the past decade, Eric has formulated a framework called the "Ka-POOM" theory, which endeavors to understand how the immense run-up in global debt will be resolved.

In short, it looks at the credit bubble that began in the early 1980's, started accelerating in 1995, and has now reached epic proportions. The amounts are so staggering at this stage that Eric believes it is too politically undesirable to let natural market adjustments clear them away — the magnitude of the deflationary pain this would create is simply unacceptable for politicians looking to get re-elected. The only other available option is to service these debts via a dramatically devalued currency. Hence the key role the Fed is playing today.

The Fed is at the epicenter of this process, intervening heavily to keep the natural corrective market forces at bay. In this, it has a dual strategy. The first is to keep asset prices high (i.e., fight asset deflation), which it is doing by keeping interest rates historically low. The second is to keep wage and commodity costs under control, which it primarily does via devaluing the currency (maintaining a "weak dollar").

And, of course, through its intervention, the Fed is doing all it can to keep the current financial system in place to perpetuate the process for as long as possible. The end result is a fundamental shift in risk from Wall Street to the taxpayer.

So the big question is: How long can this last?  Is there a point at which confidence in the system breaks and market forces finally overwhelm the intervention?

 

Eric Janszen: We Are Witnessing The Death of the Dollar
by Adam Taggart

What do you get when the producer of the world's reserve currency takes on too much debt? Nothing less than the end of the US Treasury-based monetary system.

So says Eric Janszen, economic and financial market analyst and proprietor of iTulip.com. In chronicling the decline of the global economy over the past decade, Eric has formulated a framework called the "Ka-POOM" theory, which endeavors to understand how the immense run-up in global debt will be resolved.

In short, it looks at the credit bubble that began in the early 1980's, started accelerating in 1995, and has now reached epic proportions. The amounts are so staggering at this stage that Eric believes it is too politically undesirable to let natural market adjustments clear them away — the magnitude of the deflationary pain this would create is simply unacceptable for politicians looking to get re-elected. The only other available option is to service these debts via a dramatically devalued currency. Hence the key role the Fed is playing today.

The Fed is at the epicenter of this process, intervening heavily to keep the natural corrective market forces at bay. In this, it has a dual strategy. The first is to keep asset prices high (i.e., fight asset deflation), which it is doing by keeping interest rates historically low. The second is to keep wage and commodity costs under control, which it primarily does via devaluing the currency (maintaining a "weak dollar").

And, of course, through its intervention, the Fed is doing all it can to keep the current financial system in place to perpetuate the process for as long as possible. The end result is a fundamental shift in risk from Wall Street to the taxpayer.

So the big question is: How long can this last?  Is there a point at which confidence in the system breaks and market forces finally overwhelm the intervention?

 

by Gregor Macdonald

How the Coming Decline Will Play Out

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Thursday, October 27, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Understanding The Economics Driving Energy Transition
  • California Is Serving As The Canary in the Coal Mine
  • Why The Middle Class is Getting So Squeezed While Corporations Are Flush With Cash
  • Why America Won’t Change Course Until The Status Quo Becomes Too Painful Not To
  • Predictions on How The Coming Decline Will Play Out (Until We Get Our Act Together)

Part I – The Great American False Dilemma: Austerity vs. Stimulus

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – How The Coming Decline with Play Out

Understanding The Economics Driving Energy Transition

Robert Allen of Oxford University has done some of the best work on the Industrial Revolution but he has also helped us understand the historic energy transition from Wood to Coal, in England. Along with the work of Vaclav Smil, Allen has shown that energy transitions are long, drawn out affairs that do not comport with the faith in efficiency that defines contemporary economic theory. This chart of BTU prices shows that natural gas is being offered each day in the bargain bin to the economy, but the economy is so inextricably tied to oil (liquids) that its existing infrastructure cannot take advantage of the opportunity.

></p>
<p>Have you heard any economist, from Joseph Stiglitz to Nouriel Roubini, from Greg Mankiw to Robert Barro, or from Robert Reich to Larry Summers, even mention that a million BTU in natural gas can be obtained at a nearly 75% discount to a million BTU in oil? This is precisely the kind of market failure that contemporary economists exhort their students to discount. Faith in price, and the power of price, is thought to be paramount.</p>
<p>As we know, energy costs are part of the basic business proposition for an economy. It is completely understandable that when oil priced at $14 a barrel for nearly 25 years after WW2 (in inflation adjusted terms) a new highway system, built with cheap oil and utilized with cheap oil, returned enormous profit to the economy. California’s embrace of that proposition was a trade in which low margin agriculture was swapped for much higher margin wages in Defense and Aerospace industries. This is what characterized the post-war economy in places like southern California: if you have a very powerful and energy-dense input at your disposal, you will use it ad infinitum to maximize your profit. California’s gargantuan accumulation of wealth, and its rapid build out from 1945-2000, was funded by oil. Now what?</p>
			</a>
		</div>
		<footer class=

October 27, 2011
How The Coming Decline Will Play Out
PREVIEW by Gregor Macdonald

How the Coming Decline Will Play Out

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Thursday, October 27, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Understanding The Economics Driving Energy Transition
  • California Is Serving As The Canary in the Coal Mine
  • Why The Middle Class is Getting So Squeezed While Corporations Are Flush With Cash
  • Why America Won’t Change Course Until The Status Quo Becomes Too Painful Not To
  • Predictions on How The Coming Decline Will Play Out (Until We Get Our Act Together)

Part I – The Great American False Dilemma: Austerity vs. Stimulus

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – How The Coming Decline with Play Out

Understanding The Economics Driving Energy Transition

Robert Allen of Oxford University has done some of the best work on the Industrial Revolution but he has also helped us understand the historic energy transition from Wood to Coal, in England. Along with the work of Vaclav Smil, Allen has shown that energy transitions are long, drawn out affairs that do not comport with the faith in efficiency that defines contemporary economic theory. This chart of BTU prices shows that natural gas is being offered each day in the bargain bin to the economy, but the economy is so inextricably tied to oil (liquids) that its existing infrastructure cannot take advantage of the opportunity.

></p>
<p>Have you heard any economist, from Joseph Stiglitz to Nouriel Roubini, from Greg Mankiw to Robert Barro, or from Robert Reich to Larry Summers, even mention that a million BTU in natural gas can be obtained at a nearly 75% discount to a million BTU in oil? This is precisely the kind of market failure that contemporary economists exhort their students to discount. Faith in price, and the power of price, is thought to be paramount.</p>
<p>As we know, energy costs are part of the basic business proposition for an economy. It is completely understandable that when oil priced at $14 a barrel for nearly 25 years after WW2 (in inflation adjusted terms) a new highway system, built with cheap oil and utilized with cheap oil, returned enormous profit to the economy. California’s embrace of that proposition was a trade in which low margin agriculture was swapped for much higher margin wages in Defense and Aerospace industries. This is what characterized the post-war economy in places like southern California: if you have a very powerful and energy-dense input at your disposal, you will use it ad infinitum to maximize your profit. California’s gargantuan accumulation of wealth, and its rapid build out from 1945-2000, was funded by oil. Now what?</p>
			</a>
		</div>
		<footer class=

October 27, 2011
by charleshughsmith

Contributing editor Charles Hugh Smith notes that markets are at an important inflection point. The direction things take from here may likely be apparent within the next few days.

 src=As I noted in my previous exploration of the U.S. dollar and the technical evidence for a long-term uptrend in the dollar index DXY, global markets for stocks, commodities and currencies are on a simple see-saw: On one end is the U.S. dollar, and on the other are all other major currencies, global stock markets, commodities, etc.

The U.S. stock market has been recently surging on hopes of a comprehensive settlement to the European debt/banking/euro crisis. Technically, this surge exceeds the recent trading range, and thus is seen by many traders as a valid breakout; i.e., the signal a new Bull market is underway.

This aligns with the views of many experienced technical analysts, who expect a strong rally to start from here and last into early March.  The reasons many expect such a rally, despite the headwinds of global recession, are seasonal and cyclical: Stocks almost always rally strongly in Nov.-Dec., and the third year of the presidential cycle (2011) is generally positive for stocks. In addition, various timing tools and indicators can be interpreted as supportive of a major rally from this point.

A much smaller number of analysts (including Chris) see increasing probabilities of a global stock market crash.

Massive Rally or Crash?
PREVIEW by charleshughsmith

Contributing editor Charles Hugh Smith notes that markets are at an important inflection point. The direction things take from here may likely be apparent within the next few days.

 src=As I noted in my previous exploration of the U.S. dollar and the technical evidence for a long-term uptrend in the dollar index DXY, global markets for stocks, commodities and currencies are on a simple see-saw: On one end is the U.S. dollar, and on the other are all other major currencies, global stock markets, commodities, etc.

The U.S. stock market has been recently surging on hopes of a comprehensive settlement to the European debt/banking/euro crisis. Technically, this surge exceeds the recent trading range, and thus is seen by many traders as a valid breakout; i.e., the signal a new Bull market is underway.

This aligns with the views of many experienced technical analysts, who expect a strong rally to start from here and last into early March.  The reasons many expect such a rally, despite the headwinds of global recession, are seasonal and cyclical: Stocks almost always rally strongly in Nov.-Dec., and the third year of the presidential cycle (2011) is generally positive for stocks. In addition, various timing tools and indicators can be interpreted as supportive of a major rally from this point.

A much smaller number of analysts (including Chris) see increasing probabilities of a global stock market crash.

by Chris Martenson

The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For

Monday, October 24, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Foreign official demand for US Treasurys is at its weakest in five years
  • Fed insiders are increasingly voicing the need for more stimulus
  • Why the US stock market will crash before the bond market does
  • The key metrics to watch closely as this story unfolds
  • Why higher prices AND higher unemployment are on the way

Part I – The Real Contagion Risk

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For

Custody Account Holdings Fall

In Step #1 (in Part I), the first thing I am watching for is a decrease in central bank holdings of Treasury debt. The easiest way to track this trend is through the custody account at the Fed, which is where most of the official holdings of US government securities held by foreign central banks are stored. In this custody account are both Treasury and Agency debt; luckily, they are reported independently. 

It’s still early in the day on this story, but notably we’ve just witnessed the largest two-month drop in the custody account in the past five years. Maybe it means nothing and will soon reverse, but it is possibly also the first warning sign that something has dramatically shifted in this story.
 
Here’s the data. Let’s start with the total amount of custody holdings over the past 20 years.
 

 height=

The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson

The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For

Monday, October 24, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Foreign official demand for US Treasurys is at its weakest in five years
  • Fed insiders are increasingly voicing the need for more stimulus
  • Why the US stock market will crash before the bond market does
  • The key metrics to watch closely as this story unfolds
  • Why higher prices AND higher unemployment are on the way

Part I – The Real Contagion Risk

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For

Custody Account Holdings Fall

In Step #1 (in Part I), the first thing I am watching for is a decrease in central bank holdings of Treasury debt. The easiest way to track this trend is through the custody account at the Fed, which is where most of the official holdings of US government securities held by foreign central banks are stored. In this custody account are both Treasury and Agency debt; luckily, they are reported independently. 

It’s still early in the day on this story, but notably we’ve just witnessed the largest two-month drop in the custody account in the past five years. Maybe it means nothing and will soon reverse, but it is possibly also the first warning sign that something has dramatically shifted in this story.
 
Here’s the data. Let’s start with the total amount of custody holdings over the past 20 years.
 

 height=

Total 3271 items