page-loading-spinner

Podcast

by Gregor Macdonald

Executive Summary

  • Expect the 'benefits' of QE 3 to be short-lived (<9 months)
  • Expect more radical solutions to be rolled out by Capitol Hill (not the Federal Reserve) within 90 days after QE 3, including:
    • Infrastructure build-out on a massive scale
    • Military resource redeployment to civilian projects
    • Debt jubilees
    • Tax holidays
  • A weaker dollar will be pursued
  • Capitalism will be compromised for populist gain

If you have not yet read Part I: When Quantitative Easing Finally Fails, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Had every US homeowner with a mortgage also held 100 ounces of gold through the rise and fall of the housing bubble, the balance sheet of US homeowners would already be repaired. Gold has at least tripled, if not quadrupled, through that time period.

We state this to illustrate a point. Quantitative easing (QE) and other reflationary policies benefit gold, global growth outside the United States, and the earnings of corporations — not US workers.

QE largely benefits the continued dollarization of the world, as the dollar has now fully joined the yen as a cheap funding currency. But QE does not improve wages and does not help the private sector deleverage. Indeed, despite the amount of deleveraging that has occurred in the private sector, the asset side of the private sector’s balance sheet has fallen. To put this in plainer terms, Americans have indeed been paying down their credit cards and mortgages. The problem is that their assets, primarily homes and other investments, have concurrently fallen in value. (The Federal Reserve’s Z1 Report is pretty clear in this regard; see the B.100 Table on page 120 of the 7 June, 2012 FED Flow of Funds PDF).

This lack of progress will eventually express itself in a kind of exhaustion. Either America is going to have to accept much lower levels of consumption and permanently low levels of labor participation, or the country will have to explore more innovative ways to shock its economy back to life.

Let’s take a look at a few of these possibilities:

What Radical Measures to Expect in the Post-QE Era
PREVIEW by Gregor Macdonald

Executive Summary

  • Expect the 'benefits' of QE 3 to be short-lived (<9 months)
  • Expect more radical solutions to be rolled out by Capitol Hill (not the Federal Reserve) within 90 days after QE 3, including:
    • Infrastructure build-out on a massive scale
    • Military resource redeployment to civilian projects
    • Debt jubilees
    • Tax holidays
  • A weaker dollar will be pursued
  • Capitalism will be compromised for populist gain

If you have not yet read Part I: When Quantitative Easing Finally Fails, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Had every US homeowner with a mortgage also held 100 ounces of gold through the rise and fall of the housing bubble, the balance sheet of US homeowners would already be repaired. Gold has at least tripled, if not quadrupled, through that time period.

We state this to illustrate a point. Quantitative easing (QE) and other reflationary policies benefit gold, global growth outside the United States, and the earnings of corporations — not US workers.

QE largely benefits the continued dollarization of the world, as the dollar has now fully joined the yen as a cheap funding currency. But QE does not improve wages and does not help the private sector deleverage. Indeed, despite the amount of deleveraging that has occurred in the private sector, the asset side of the private sector’s balance sheet has fallen. To put this in plainer terms, Americans have indeed been paying down their credit cards and mortgages. The problem is that their assets, primarily homes and other investments, have concurrently fallen in value. (The Federal Reserve’s Z1 Report is pretty clear in this regard; see the B.100 Table on page 120 of the 7 June, 2012 FED Flow of Funds PDF).

This lack of progress will eventually express itself in a kind of exhaustion. Either America is going to have to accept much lower levels of consumption and permanently low levels of labor participation, or the country will have to explore more innovative ways to shock its economy back to life.

Let’s take a look at a few of these possibilities:

by Chris Martenson

There is nothing inherently environmentally damaging about human participation. Yes, I admit it and repent in sackcloth and ashes for all of the human devastation that has been caused throughout history. It has been caused long before the USDA, long before America, long before a lot of things.

It does not have to be so. In fact, we are not only the most efficient at destroying it; we are also the most efficient at healing it.

So states Joel Salatin, one of the most visible and influential leaders in the organic food and sustainable farming movement. Joel returns as a guest to discuss "ecological participation" – methods by which humans can create a much more resilient landscape than current mass agricultural practices allow for.

Among other topics covered in this podcast, Joel and Chris focus the current drought gripping much of the US (and other countries). How unusual is it in its severity? What's causing it? What can be done to reduce our vulnerability in the future?

Joel's basic point is that there is a wide set of solutions that are possible to implement today, at scale, that can have an enormously restorative impact on our ecology without sacrificing crop production yields. Some of these involve returning to practices common in past generations before modern factory farming, others arise from new innovative thinking and technologies.

The only obstacle to implementing these solutions is our own intransigence. Our politics and economy are deeply wed to the heavily depleting and input-dependent practices of modern mega-farms. So there are big interests concerned with protecting the status quo, even though it is simply not sustainable in the long term. 

Which is why Joel is a big believer in action at the individual level. The more households and local communities begin implementing these sustainable solutions, more momentum will build to change perception and thinking at the state and national level. Plus, our local foodsheds and watersheds will be better off from these efforts – so why not get started now?

Joel Salatin: We Are the Solution, as Well as the Problem
by Chris Martenson

There is nothing inherently environmentally damaging about human participation. Yes, I admit it and repent in sackcloth and ashes for all of the human devastation that has been caused throughout history. It has been caused long before the USDA, long before America, long before a lot of things.

It does not have to be so. In fact, we are not only the most efficient at destroying it; we are also the most efficient at healing it.

So states Joel Salatin, one of the most visible and influential leaders in the organic food and sustainable farming movement. Joel returns as a guest to discuss "ecological participation" – methods by which humans can create a much more resilient landscape than current mass agricultural practices allow for.

Among other topics covered in this podcast, Joel and Chris focus the current drought gripping much of the US (and other countries). How unusual is it in its severity? What's causing it? What can be done to reduce our vulnerability in the future?

Joel's basic point is that there is a wide set of solutions that are possible to implement today, at scale, that can have an enormously restorative impact on our ecology without sacrificing crop production yields. Some of these involve returning to practices common in past generations before modern factory farming, others arise from new innovative thinking and technologies.

The only obstacle to implementing these solutions is our own intransigence. Our politics and economy are deeply wed to the heavily depleting and input-dependent practices of modern mega-farms. So there are big interests concerned with protecting the status quo, even though it is simply not sustainable in the long term. 

Which is why Joel is a big believer in action at the individual level. The more households and local communities begin implementing these sustainable solutions, more momentum will build to change perception and thinking at the state and national level. Plus, our local foodsheds and watersheds will be better off from these efforts – so why not get started now?

Total 6439 items

Daily Digest

Please login to submit a story to the Daily Digest.

View Past Daily Digests