page-loading-spinner
Home Preparedness

Preparedness

by Gregor Macdonald

Why We Must Embrace Simplicity Now

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Executive Summary

  • What current gold demand is telling us about economic growth expectations
  • The dangerous conclusion from the famous Simon-Ehrlich wager
  • Simpler energy sources are becoming cost-competitive with complex ones
  • Why we will move towards greater simplicity, willingly or not 
  • Why many of our leaders are blind to this trend and will spend the next decade futilely fighting it. Will you?

Part I: Returning to Simplicity (Whether We Want To or Not)

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II: Why We Must Embrace Simplicity Now

The English thinker Thomas Malthus argued in his famous essay on the principle of population that there was no longer sufficient land to feed the world’s rapidly growing population, threatening poverty and famine. But an agro-industrial revolution soon transformed the economies of Europe and North America, and his fears proved unfounded. More recently, conventional wisdom held that market forces would always come to the rescue. Until ten years ago, this hope was largely fulfilled. During most of the 20th century, resource prices—of food, water, energy, steel, for example—declined, despite strong growth in the world’s population and even stronger growth in GDP. Prices fell because of a combination of new low-cost sources of supply and technological innovation. But in the past ten years, demand from emerging markets, particularly in Asia, has erased all the price declines of the previous century.

Resource Revolution, from McKinsey and Company

It’s taken ten years of relentless inflation in food and energy, with myriad data showing declines in the quality and availability of many natural resources, for it to appear that the global consultancy McKinsey finally “gets it!”

I take this as a potential sign that Kahneman’s Availability Heuristic is about to undergo a sea change with regards to the prospects of technology-driven progress. Two hundred years of history exert a powerful force over people’s outlook, but a solid ten-year reversal of those trends just might be enough to induce some folks to begin reconsidering their previously-unshakable confidence in previous trends.

Why We Must Embrace Simplicity Now
PREVIEW by Gregor Macdonald

Why We Must Embrace Simplicity Now

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Executive Summary

  • What current gold demand is telling us about economic growth expectations
  • The dangerous conclusion from the famous Simon-Ehrlich wager
  • Simpler energy sources are becoming cost-competitive with complex ones
  • Why we will move towards greater simplicity, willingly or not 
  • Why many of our leaders are blind to this trend and will spend the next decade futilely fighting it. Will you?

Part I: Returning to Simplicity (Whether We Want To or Not)

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II: Why We Must Embrace Simplicity Now

The English thinker Thomas Malthus argued in his famous essay on the principle of population that there was no longer sufficient land to feed the world’s rapidly growing population, threatening poverty and famine. But an agro-industrial revolution soon transformed the economies of Europe and North America, and his fears proved unfounded. More recently, conventional wisdom held that market forces would always come to the rescue. Until ten years ago, this hope was largely fulfilled. During most of the 20th century, resource prices—of food, water, energy, steel, for example—declined, despite strong growth in the world’s population and even stronger growth in GDP. Prices fell because of a combination of new low-cost sources of supply and technological innovation. But in the past ten years, demand from emerging markets, particularly in Asia, has erased all the price declines of the previous century.

Resource Revolution, from McKinsey and Company

It’s taken ten years of relentless inflation in food and energy, with myriad data showing declines in the quality and availability of many natural resources, for it to appear that the global consultancy McKinsey finally “gets it!”

I take this as a potential sign that Kahneman’s Availability Heuristic is about to undergo a sea change with regards to the prospects of technology-driven progress. Two hundred years of history exert a powerful force over people’s outlook, but a solid ten-year reversal of those trends just might be enough to induce some folks to begin reconsidering their previously-unshakable confidence in previous trends.

by Gregor Macdonald

  src=

 photo: BP Oil Leak photo series via Boston Globe, Mark Ralston – AFP/Getty Images

Eventually the point is reached when all the energy and resources available to a society are required just to maintain its existing level of complexity. 

– Joseph Tainter

The modern world depends on economic growth to function properly. And throughout the living memory of every human on earth today, technology has continually developed to extract more and more raw material from the environment to power that growth.

This has produced a faithful belief among the public that has helped to blur the lines between human innovation and limited natural resources. Technology does not create resources, though it does embody our ability to access resources. When the two are operating smoothly in tandem, society mistakes one for the other. This has created a new and very modern problem — a misplaced trust in technology to consistently fulfill our economic needs.

What happens once key resources become so dilute that technology, by itself, can no longer meet our growth needs? 

Returning to Simplicity (Whether We Want To or Not)
by Gregor Macdonald

  src=

 photo: BP Oil Leak photo series via Boston Globe, Mark Ralston – AFP/Getty Images

Eventually the point is reached when all the energy and resources available to a society are required just to maintain its existing level of complexity. 

– Joseph Tainter

The modern world depends on economic growth to function properly. And throughout the living memory of every human on earth today, technology has continually developed to extract more and more raw material from the environment to power that growth.

This has produced a faithful belief among the public that has helped to blur the lines between human innovation and limited natural resources. Technology does not create resources, though it does embody our ability to access resources. When the two are operating smoothly in tandem, society mistakes one for the other. This has created a new and very modern problem — a misplaced trust in technology to consistently fulfill our economic needs.

What happens once key resources become so dilute that technology, by itself, can no longer meet our growth needs? 

by dps

 src=Some CM.com members may have become interested in beekeeping as one possible means of increasing resilience in their lives. In this What Should I Do (WSID) article, Small-Scale Beekeeping, user apismellifera gives a great introduction to the topic (the pictures are of Langstroth equipment; you may want to remember this for later in this article). In this article, we'll be getting a lot more specific about a particular task unique to winter beekeeping.

Beekeepers would, ideally, like to be able to winter our bees without supplemental feeding. Bees, after all, have been getting through winter far longer than humans have been managing bees. Bees, planning ahead, store honey and pollen specifically for this purpose. These days, with winter losses frequently hitting 30-40% of colonies dying each year, many of us are turning to feeding as a way of increasing our chances of getting to spring with live bees. Where Old Man Winter can keep temperatures down in the 20s (F) or below for extended periods of time, it's nice to have a way to get supplemental feeding to your bees without dealing with liquid syrup feeders. Liquid feeders, especially in cold temperatures, can potentially do harm by chilling your bees, which is clearly not what you set out to do when you decided to feed them.

Honey Bee Candy: Winter Feeding
by dps

 src=Some CM.com members may have become interested in beekeeping as one possible means of increasing resilience in their lives. In this What Should I Do (WSID) article, Small-Scale Beekeeping, user apismellifera gives a great introduction to the topic (the pictures are of Langstroth equipment; you may want to remember this for later in this article). In this article, we'll be getting a lot more specific about a particular task unique to winter beekeeping.

Beekeepers would, ideally, like to be able to winter our bees without supplemental feeding. Bees, after all, have been getting through winter far longer than humans have been managing bees. Bees, planning ahead, store honey and pollen specifically for this purpose. These days, with winter losses frequently hitting 30-40% of colonies dying each year, many of us are turning to feeding as a way of increasing our chances of getting to spring with live bees. Where Old Man Winter can keep temperatures down in the 20s (F) or below for extended periods of time, it's nice to have a way to get supplemental feeding to your bees without dealing with liquid syrup feeders. Liquid feeders, especially in cold temperatures, can potentially do harm by chilling your bees, which is clearly not what you set out to do when you decided to feed them.

by Chris Martenson

Are You Prepared for $200 Oil?

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Executive Summary

  • Higher oil prices caused by an Iran conflict could very well be the trigger for the next major economic downturn
  • Where oil prices will likely go, and how quickly, if a conflict erupts in the Persian Gulf 
  • The prudent steps you should take now, in advance of a potential conflict
  • How the financial markets will react, and likely safe havens
  • Why a war with Iran will be much messier than the Iraq war

Part I: Iran: Oh, No; Not Again

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II: Are You Prepared for $200 Oil?

In Part I, we connected a few dots and made the point that Iran remains the last unconquered oil province within the last great deposit fields left on the planet. Perhaps it is coincidence that Iran now finds itself in the crosshairs, but that is unlikely. Instead, the oil treasures of the Middle East remain the last great prize, and Iran is unlucky enough to be standing in the way.

Once one understands where we are in the Peak Oil story, all of these maneuvers make sense and conform to a brutal but coherent logic: If oil supplies are dwindling as fast as the data suggests, then controlling the last, best supplies will be considered essential by every interested party.

While such speculation is interesting to engage in, there’s really nothing you or I can do to alter these events. Instead, our job is to prepare as best we can.

The larger set of world events is grinding inexorably towards a lower standard of living, with the squabbling at present really being over who eats the first sets of losses. However, the next leg of the downturn will be precipitated by some event, and a war with Iran that spikes oil prices would be a perfect catalyst.

Are You Prepared for $200 Oil?
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson

Are You Prepared for $200 Oil?

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Executive Summary

  • Higher oil prices caused by an Iran conflict could very well be the trigger for the next major economic downturn
  • Where oil prices will likely go, and how quickly, if a conflict erupts in the Persian Gulf 
  • The prudent steps you should take now, in advance of a potential conflict
  • How the financial markets will react, and likely safe havens
  • Why a war with Iran will be much messier than the Iraq war

Part I: Iran: Oh, No; Not Again

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II: Are You Prepared for $200 Oil?

In Part I, we connected a few dots and made the point that Iran remains the last unconquered oil province within the last great deposit fields left on the planet. Perhaps it is coincidence that Iran now finds itself in the crosshairs, but that is unlikely. Instead, the oil treasures of the Middle East remain the last great prize, and Iran is unlucky enough to be standing in the way.

Once one understands where we are in the Peak Oil story, all of these maneuvers make sense and conform to a brutal but coherent logic: If oil supplies are dwindling as fast as the data suggests, then controlling the last, best supplies will be considered essential by every interested party.

While such speculation is interesting to engage in, there’s really nothing you or I can do to alter these events. Instead, our job is to prepare as best we can.

The larger set of world events is grinding inexorably towards a lower standard of living, with the squabbling at present really being over who eats the first sets of losses. However, the next leg of the downturn will be precipitated by some event, and a war with Iran that spikes oil prices would be a perfect catalyst.

by Aaron M

[Note: This WSID Article is an updated version of an article Aaron previously submitted in March 2011 (see original). There will be additional follow-on articles that will compliment this one on Understanding Emergencies. This article still complements Aaron's earlier "Practical Survival Skills 101" posts on fire, water, and shelter.]

Preface: What is an emergency? 

 src=There is an awful lot of academic banter in which we try to “identify” emergencies before they happen. Pedantic issues are categorized and specifics are assigned to them as potential resolutions. This is not a “flawed” approach, but it’s endemic in the American mindset, which is obsessed with micromanagement.

In order to distance ourselves from the details, which are too stochastic and specific, we can generally state that an emergency is a shortage of resources.

Resources can be defined as:

Practical Survival Skills 101 – Understanding Emergencies (Updated)
by Aaron M

[Note: This WSID Article is an updated version of an article Aaron previously submitted in March 2011 (see original). There will be additional follow-on articles that will compliment this one on Understanding Emergencies. This article still complements Aaron's earlier "Practical Survival Skills 101" posts on fire, water, and shelter.]

Preface: What is an emergency? 

 src=There is an awful lot of academic banter in which we try to “identify” emergencies before they happen. Pedantic issues are categorized and specifics are assigned to them as potential resolutions. This is not a “flawed” approach, but it’s endemic in the American mindset, which is obsessed with micromanagement.

In order to distance ourselves from the details, which are too stochastic and specific, we can generally state that an emergency is a shortage of resources.

Resources can be defined as:

by Gregor Macdonald

Preparing for Higher Food Prices

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Executive Summary

  • How urbanization is accelerating the loss of the world’s arable land
  • The three major trends that will impact global food prices and potentially create even more volatility in the next few years
  • How virtual water introduces a new threat of resource conflicts
  • Why our government’s actions to revive the economy translates into higher prices for food and other hard assets
  • Why greater volatility in food prices lies ahead
  • Defensive strategies against higher food prices

Part I: A Punch to the Mouth: Food Price Volatility Hits the World

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II: Preparing for Higher Food Prices

Close-up: The Loss of Arable Land Per Capita

Recent data from the World Bank shows that arable land per capita has been declining globally for 40 years. This has been true in most countries, especially the juggernauts of India and China. But we have compensated for that decline with fertilizer. As Julian Cribb points out in his book (page 72), it has been asserted that “over two billion people would not be alive today, were it not for the invention of the industrial process for making nitrogen fertilizer.”

Indeed, we know that 2008 was an important milestone in the history of humankind: That was the year that the majority of the world population, for the first time, lived in urban centers. The rapid urbanization — and therefore loss of farmland — in Non-OECD countries may have produced wonderful stock market returns for the past two decades as developed-nation capital hooked in to such rapid growth. However, it is not clear that this process has upgraded humanity’s overall quality of life. Energy inputs do upgrade diets. And energy inputs also can reduce the suffering of burdensome, human-powered labor. But the associated pollution and environmental destruction exacts a heavy price for such a transition.

Preparing for Higher Food Prices
PREVIEW by Gregor Macdonald

Preparing for Higher Food Prices

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Executive Summary

  • How urbanization is accelerating the loss of the world’s arable land
  • The three major trends that will impact global food prices and potentially create even more volatility in the next few years
  • How virtual water introduces a new threat of resource conflicts
  • Why our government’s actions to revive the economy translates into higher prices for food and other hard assets
  • Why greater volatility in food prices lies ahead
  • Defensive strategies against higher food prices

Part I: A Punch to the Mouth: Food Price Volatility Hits the World

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II: Preparing for Higher Food Prices

Close-up: The Loss of Arable Land Per Capita

Recent data from the World Bank shows that arable land per capita has been declining globally for 40 years. This has been true in most countries, especially the juggernauts of India and China. But we have compensated for that decline with fertilizer. As Julian Cribb points out in his book (page 72), it has been asserted that “over two billion people would not be alive today, were it not for the invention of the industrial process for making nitrogen fertilizer.”

Indeed, we know that 2008 was an important milestone in the history of humankind: That was the year that the majority of the world population, for the first time, lived in urban centers. The rapid urbanization — and therefore loss of farmland — in Non-OECD countries may have produced wonderful stock market returns for the past two decades as developed-nation capital hooked in to such rapid growth. However, it is not clear that this process has upgraded humanity’s overall quality of life. Energy inputs do upgrade diets. And energy inputs also can reduce the suffering of burdensome, human-powered labor. But the associated pollution and environmental destruction exacts a heavy price for such a transition.

Total 1239 items