page-loading-spinner

Insider

by Chris Martenson

Executive Summary

  • The real (and growing) risk of one or several systemic breakdowns
  • What to expect during a breakdown of our
    • Economy
    • Energy systems
    • Environmental systems
  • The importance of intelligent stewardship, and focusing on controlling the variable you can

If you have not yet read Part 1: If We're Going To Borrow Against The Future, Let's Borrow To Invest available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

But what if don’t invest in our future as outlined in part I?  What if the powers that be and system-wide inertia combine to simply deliver us more of the same going forward? 

What if we simply have a profound failure of leadership and none of that good stuff happens, and the next round(s) of QE simply fatten up the trading profits of large banks and hedge funds?

One sign you’ll have that we’re headed nowhere fast in the US is if the next election for president involves a Bush and a Clinton.  That will be a choice between status quo option A and status quo option B, which is no choice at all.

As Winston Churchill said about Americans, you can always count on them to do the right thing…after they’ve tried everything else. 

Unfortunately, we don’t have time in this story to try everything else first and if we don’t do things differently, then I see no other outcome besides a huge, systemic breakdown occurring across…

What Systemic Breakdown Will Look Like
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson

Executive Summary

  • The real (and growing) risk of one or several systemic breakdowns
  • What to expect during a breakdown of our
    • Economy
    • Energy systems
    • Environmental systems
  • The importance of intelligent stewardship, and focusing on controlling the variable you can

If you have not yet read Part 1: If We're Going To Borrow Against The Future, Let's Borrow To Invest available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

But what if don’t invest in our future as outlined in part I?  What if the powers that be and system-wide inertia combine to simply deliver us more of the same going forward? 

What if we simply have a profound failure of leadership and none of that good stuff happens, and the next round(s) of QE simply fatten up the trading profits of large banks and hedge funds?

One sign you’ll have that we’re headed nowhere fast in the US is if the next election for president involves a Bush and a Clinton.  That will be a choice between status quo option A and status quo option B, which is no choice at all.

As Winston Churchill said about Americans, you can always count on them to do the right thing…after they’ve tried everything else. 

Unfortunately, we don’t have time in this story to try everything else first and if we don’t do things differently, then I see no other outcome besides a huge, systemic breakdown occurring across…

by charleshughsmith

Executive Summary

  • Crisis intervention as policy = bad decision-making
  • Why politics will defer dealing with the big problems, even though that will make them even bigger
  • Why more taxes are in your future
  • The criticality of increasing our alternatives — without our agitation, the government will appropriate from us while claiming "there's no other option"

If you have not yet read Part 1: Things Are Unraveling At An Accelerating Rate available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

In Part 1, we examined how the dynamic of lowering interest rates to boost debt-based consumption inevitably leads to debt saturation and lower consumption. It also generates instability and rising systemic risks.  As the returns on the central bank tricks of lowering interest rates and encouraging borrowing diminish, the resulting unraveling is speeding up.

There is another core dynamic at work: TINA, there is no alternative.

When There Is No Choice, Bad Policies Abound

In this week’s podcast with Chris (What To Expect From The Fourth Turning We're Now In), guest Neil Howe noted that crisis intervention is the result of authorities “feeling they had no other choice,” a.k.a. TINA.  In this frame of mind, the eventual consequences of crisis intervention policies are ignored in the pressing desperation to make the financial and political pain of crisis go away.

As policymakers around the world soon discovered, TINA policies are habit-forming. Since they had no choice but to bail out the parasitic, dysfunctional banking sector, and goose debt-based consumption with cash for clunkers, mass purchases of mortgages, etc., they also had no choice but to continue these interventions, lest the desired result—expanding consumption and a rising stock market—falter.

Substituting crisis intervention for long-term constructive policies leads to bad policies, for the simple reason that…

The Coming Age Of Confiscation
PREVIEW by charleshughsmith

Executive Summary

  • Crisis intervention as policy = bad decision-making
  • Why politics will defer dealing with the big problems, even though that will make them even bigger
  • Why more taxes are in your future
  • The criticality of increasing our alternatives — without our agitation, the government will appropriate from us while claiming "there's no other option"

If you have not yet read Part 1: Things Are Unraveling At An Accelerating Rate available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

In Part 1, we examined how the dynamic of lowering interest rates to boost debt-based consumption inevitably leads to debt saturation and lower consumption. It also generates instability and rising systemic risks.  As the returns on the central bank tricks of lowering interest rates and encouraging borrowing diminish, the resulting unraveling is speeding up.

There is another core dynamic at work: TINA, there is no alternative.

When There Is No Choice, Bad Policies Abound

In this week’s podcast with Chris (What To Expect From The Fourth Turning We're Now In), guest Neil Howe noted that crisis intervention is the result of authorities “feeling they had no other choice,” a.k.a. TINA.  In this frame of mind, the eventual consequences of crisis intervention policies are ignored in the pressing desperation to make the financial and political pain of crisis go away.

As policymakers around the world soon discovered, TINA policies are habit-forming. Since they had no choice but to bail out the parasitic, dysfunctional banking sector, and goose debt-based consumption with cash for clunkers, mass purchases of mortgages, etc., they also had no choice but to continue these interventions, lest the desired result—expanding consumption and a rising stock market—falter.

Substituting crisis intervention for long-term constructive policies leads to bad policies, for the simple reason that…

by Chris Martenson

Executive Summary

  • There's much you can do to reduce your risk in advance of the arrival of a:
    • Trade war
    • Energy war
    • Financial war
    • Cyber war
    • Grid-down sabotage
    • Shooting war
    • Nuclear war
  • The steps you should prioritze the most right now

If you have not yet read Part 1: Is It Time To Prepare For War? available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

As a preamble, I need to note that I do not enjoy or derive any satisfaction from writing about or spending time on figuring out how to dodge the worst impacts of human behavior.  War sits right at the top of my ‘This is stupid’  list, as war represents the idea that all other attempts at being smart or diplomatic have already failed.  I'm sorry that I have to spend time writing this report, and I am sorry that you have to spend time considering it.  With that said, I feel I have no choice, and somebody has to take on this task.  With a heavy heart…

If the West (meaning the US and Europe) decides to further goad Russia, war may be inevitable. Sooner or later, Russia will have to switch from 'response' mode to 'reaction' mode.  I’ve previous detailed the reasons for this in previous reports here, here and here.

As (sadly) expected, things have only escalated over the past year, not de-escalated. The West has a serious bone to pick with Russia, yet nobody can really explain what it is or why the conflict exists. (As an aside, I think it’s just bruised neo-con egos over Syria, but it really doesn’t matter what the explanation is at this point.) So, here we are in la-la land.

The consequences of an escalated conflict between Russia and the US/West could range from a very minor skirmish fought over some relatively meaningless items of trade, to an attack on financial markets, all the way to an all-out nuclear exchange.

The question becomes: What, if anything, can we do to prepare?

Lots, as it turns out.

No matter where…

How To Prepare For War
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson

Executive Summary

  • There's much you can do to reduce your risk in advance of the arrival of a:
    • Trade war
    • Energy war
    • Financial war
    • Cyber war
    • Grid-down sabotage
    • Shooting war
    • Nuclear war
  • The steps you should prioritze the most right now

If you have not yet read Part 1: Is It Time To Prepare For War? available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

As a preamble, I need to note that I do not enjoy or derive any satisfaction from writing about or spending time on figuring out how to dodge the worst impacts of human behavior.  War sits right at the top of my ‘This is stupid’  list, as war represents the idea that all other attempts at being smart or diplomatic have already failed.  I'm sorry that I have to spend time writing this report, and I am sorry that you have to spend time considering it.  With that said, I feel I have no choice, and somebody has to take on this task.  With a heavy heart…

If the West (meaning the US and Europe) decides to further goad Russia, war may be inevitable. Sooner or later, Russia will have to switch from 'response' mode to 'reaction' mode.  I’ve previous detailed the reasons for this in previous reports here, here and here.

As (sadly) expected, things have only escalated over the past year, not de-escalated. The West has a serious bone to pick with Russia, yet nobody can really explain what it is or why the conflict exists. (As an aside, I think it’s just bruised neo-con egos over Syria, but it really doesn’t matter what the explanation is at this point.) So, here we are in la-la land.

The consequences of an escalated conflict between Russia and the US/West could range from a very minor skirmish fought over some relatively meaningless items of trade, to an attack on financial markets, all the way to an all-out nuclear exchange.

The question becomes: What, if anything, can we do to prepare?

Lots, as it turns out.

No matter where…

Total 1089 items