page-loading-spinner

Podcast

by Chris Martenson

What do you get when the producer of the world's reserve currency takes on too much debt? Nothing less than the end of the US Treasury-based monetary system.

So says Eric Janszen, economic and financial market analyst and proprietor of iTulip.com. In chronicling the decline of the global economy over the past decade, Eric has formulated a framework called the "Ka-POOM" theory, which endeavors to understand how the immense run-up in global debt will be resolved.

In short, it looks at the credit bubble that began in the early 1980's, started accelerating in 1995, and has now reached epic proportions. The amounts are so staggering at this stage that Eric believes it is too politically undesirable to let natural market adjustments clear them away — the magnitude of the deflationary pain this would create is simply unacceptable for politicians looking to get re-elected. The only other available option is to service these debts via a dramatically devalued currency. Hence the key role the Fed is playing today.

The Fed is at the epicenter of this process, intervening heavily to keep the natural corrective market forces at bay. In this, it has a dual strategy. The first is to keep asset prices high (i.e., fight asset deflation), which it is doing by keeping interest rates historically low. The second is to keep wage and commodity costs under control, which it primarily does via devaluing the currency (maintaining a "weak dollar").

And, of course, through its intervention, the Fed is doing all it can to keep the current financial system in place to perpetuate the process for as long as possible. The end result is a fundamental shift in risk from Wall Street to the taxpayer.

So the big question is: How long can this last?  Is there a point at which confidence in the system breaks and market forces finally overwhelm the intervention?

 

Eric Janszen: We Are Witnessing The Death of the Dollar
by Chris Martenson

What do you get when the producer of the world's reserve currency takes on too much debt? Nothing less than the end of the US Treasury-based monetary system.

So says Eric Janszen, economic and financial market analyst and proprietor of iTulip.com. In chronicling the decline of the global economy over the past decade, Eric has formulated a framework called the "Ka-POOM" theory, which endeavors to understand how the immense run-up in global debt will be resolved.

In short, it looks at the credit bubble that began in the early 1980's, started accelerating in 1995, and has now reached epic proportions. The amounts are so staggering at this stage that Eric believes it is too politically undesirable to let natural market adjustments clear them away — the magnitude of the deflationary pain this would create is simply unacceptable for politicians looking to get re-elected. The only other available option is to service these debts via a dramatically devalued currency. Hence the key role the Fed is playing today.

The Fed is at the epicenter of this process, intervening heavily to keep the natural corrective market forces at bay. In this, it has a dual strategy. The first is to keep asset prices high (i.e., fight asset deflation), which it is doing by keeping interest rates historically low. The second is to keep wage and commodity costs under control, which it primarily does via devaluing the currency (maintaining a "weak dollar").

And, of course, through its intervention, the Fed is doing all it can to keep the current financial system in place to perpetuate the process for as long as possible. The end result is a fundamental shift in risk from Wall Street to the taxpayer.

So the big question is: How long can this last?  Is there a point at which confidence in the system breaks and market forces finally overwhelm the intervention?

 

by Gregor Macdonald

How the Coming Decline Will Play Out

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Thursday, October 27, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Understanding The Economics Driving Energy Transition
  • California Is Serving As The Canary in the Coal Mine
  • Why The Middle Class is Getting So Squeezed While Corporations Are Flush With Cash
  • Why America Won’t Change Course Until The Status Quo Becomes Too Painful Not To
  • Predictions on How The Coming Decline Will Play Out (Until We Get Our Act Together)

Part I – The Great American False Dilemma: Austerity vs. Stimulus

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – How The Coming Decline with Play Out

Understanding The Economics Driving Energy Transition

Robert Allen of Oxford University has done some of the best work on the Industrial Revolution but he has also helped us understand the historic energy transition from Wood to Coal, in England. Along with the work of Vaclav Smil, Allen has shown that energy transitions are long, drawn out affairs that do not comport with the faith in efficiency that defines contemporary economic theory. This chart of BTU prices shows that natural gas is being offered each day in the bargain bin to the economy, but the economy is so inextricably tied to oil (liquids) that its existing infrastructure cannot take advantage of the opportunity.

></p>
<p>Have you heard any economist, from Joseph Stiglitz to Nouriel Roubini, from Greg Mankiw to Robert Barro, or from Robert Reich to Larry Summers, even mention that a million BTU in natural gas can be obtained at a nearly 75% discount to a million BTU in oil? This is precisely the kind of market failure that contemporary economists exhort their students to discount. Faith in price, and the power of price, is thought to be paramount.</p>
<p>As we know, energy costs are part of the basic business proposition for an economy. It is completely understandable that when oil priced at $14 a barrel for nearly 25 years after WW2 (in inflation adjusted terms) a new highway system, built with cheap oil and utilized with cheap oil, returned enormous profit to the economy. California’s embrace of that proposition was a trade in which low margin agriculture was swapped for much higher margin wages in Defense and Aerospace industries. This is what characterized the post-war economy in places like southern California: if you have a very powerful and energy-dense input at your disposal, you will use it ad infinitum to maximize your profit. California’s gargantuan accumulation of wealth, and its rapid build out from 1945-2000, was funded by oil. Now what?</p>
			</a>
		</div>
		<footer class=

October 27, 2011
How The Coming Decline Will Play Out
PREVIEW by Gregor Macdonald

How the Coming Decline Will Play Out

by Gregor Macdonald, contributing editor
Thursday, October 27, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Understanding The Economics Driving Energy Transition
  • California Is Serving As The Canary in the Coal Mine
  • Why The Middle Class is Getting So Squeezed While Corporations Are Flush With Cash
  • Why America Won’t Change Course Until The Status Quo Becomes Too Painful Not To
  • Predictions on How The Coming Decline Will Play Out (Until We Get Our Act Together)

Part I – The Great American False Dilemma: Austerity vs. Stimulus

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – How The Coming Decline with Play Out

Understanding The Economics Driving Energy Transition

Robert Allen of Oxford University has done some of the best work on the Industrial Revolution but he has also helped us understand the historic energy transition from Wood to Coal, in England. Along with the work of Vaclav Smil, Allen has shown that energy transitions are long, drawn out affairs that do not comport with the faith in efficiency that defines contemporary economic theory. This chart of BTU prices shows that natural gas is being offered each day in the bargain bin to the economy, but the economy is so inextricably tied to oil (liquids) that its existing infrastructure cannot take advantage of the opportunity.

></p>
<p>Have you heard any economist, from Joseph Stiglitz to Nouriel Roubini, from Greg Mankiw to Robert Barro, or from Robert Reich to Larry Summers, even mention that a million BTU in natural gas can be obtained at a nearly 75% discount to a million BTU in oil? This is precisely the kind of market failure that contemporary economists exhort their students to discount. Faith in price, and the power of price, is thought to be paramount.</p>
<p>As we know, energy costs are part of the basic business proposition for an economy. It is completely understandable that when oil priced at $14 a barrel for nearly 25 years after WW2 (in inflation adjusted terms) a new highway system, built with cheap oil and utilized with cheap oil, returned enormous profit to the economy. California’s embrace of that proposition was a trade in which low margin agriculture was swapped for much higher margin wages in Defense and Aerospace industries. This is what characterized the post-war economy in places like southern California: if you have a very powerful and energy-dense input at your disposal, you will use it ad infinitum to maximize your profit. California’s gargantuan accumulation of wealth, and its rapid build out from 1945-2000, was funded by oil. Now what?</p>
			</a>
		</div>
		<footer class=

October 27, 2011
by charleshughsmith

Contributing editor Charles Hugh Smith notes that markets are at an important inflection point. The direction things take from here may likely be apparent within the next few days.

 src=As I noted in my previous exploration of the U.S. dollar and the technical evidence for a long-term uptrend in the dollar index DXY, global markets for stocks, commodities and currencies are on a simple see-saw: On one end is the U.S. dollar, and on the other are all other major currencies, global stock markets, commodities, etc.

The U.S. stock market has been recently surging on hopes of a comprehensive settlement to the European debt/banking/euro crisis. Technically, this surge exceeds the recent trading range, and thus is seen by many traders as a valid breakout; i.e., the signal a new Bull market is underway.

This aligns with the views of many experienced technical analysts, who expect a strong rally to start from here and last into early March.  The reasons many expect such a rally, despite the headwinds of global recession, are seasonal and cyclical: Stocks almost always rally strongly in Nov.-Dec., and the third year of the presidential cycle (2011) is generally positive for stocks. In addition, various timing tools and indicators can be interpreted as supportive of a major rally from this point.

A much smaller number of analysts (including Chris) see increasing probabilities of a global stock market crash.

Massive Rally or Crash?
PREVIEW by charleshughsmith

Contributing editor Charles Hugh Smith notes that markets are at an important inflection point. The direction things take from here may likely be apparent within the next few days.

 src=As I noted in my previous exploration of the U.S. dollar and the technical evidence for a long-term uptrend in the dollar index DXY, global markets for stocks, commodities and currencies are on a simple see-saw: On one end is the U.S. dollar, and on the other are all other major currencies, global stock markets, commodities, etc.

The U.S. stock market has been recently surging on hopes of a comprehensive settlement to the European debt/banking/euro crisis. Technically, this surge exceeds the recent trading range, and thus is seen by many traders as a valid breakout; i.e., the signal a new Bull market is underway.

This aligns with the views of many experienced technical analysts, who expect a strong rally to start from here and last into early March.  The reasons many expect such a rally, despite the headwinds of global recession, are seasonal and cyclical: Stocks almost always rally strongly in Nov.-Dec., and the third year of the presidential cycle (2011) is generally positive for stocks. In addition, various timing tools and indicators can be interpreted as supportive of a major rally from this point.

A much smaller number of analysts (including Chris) see increasing probabilities of a global stock market crash.

by Chris Martenson

The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For

Monday, October 24, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Foreign official demand for US Treasurys is at its weakest in five years
  • Fed insiders are increasingly voicing the need for more stimulus
  • Why the US stock market will crash before the bond market does
  • The key metrics to watch closely as this story unfolds
  • Why higher prices AND higher unemployment are on the way

Part I – The Real Contagion Risk

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For

Custody Account Holdings Fall

In Step #1 (in Part I), the first thing I am watching for is a decrease in central bank holdings of Treasury debt. The easiest way to track this trend is through the custody account at the Fed, which is where most of the official holdings of US government securities held by foreign central banks are stored. In this custody account are both Treasury and Agency debt; luckily, they are reported independently. 

It’s still early in the day on this story, but notably we’ve just witnessed the largest two-month drop in the custody account in the past five years. Maybe it means nothing and will soon reverse, but it is possibly also the first warning sign that something has dramatically shifted in this story.
 
Here’s the data. Let’s start with the total amount of custody holdings over the past 20 years.
 

 height=

The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson

The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For

Monday, October 24, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Foreign official demand for US Treasurys is at its weakest in five years
  • Fed insiders are increasingly voicing the need for more stimulus
  • Why the US stock market will crash before the bond market does
  • The key metrics to watch closely as this story unfolds
  • Why higher prices AND higher unemployment are on the way

Part I – The Real Contagion Risk

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – The Flashing Market Indicators To Watch For

Custody Account Holdings Fall

In Step #1 (in Part I), the first thing I am watching for is a decrease in central bank holdings of Treasury debt. The easiest way to track this trend is through the custody account at the Fed, which is where most of the official holdings of US government securities held by foreign central banks are stored. In this custody account are both Treasury and Agency debt; luckily, they are reported independently. 

It’s still early in the day on this story, but notably we’ve just witnessed the largest two-month drop in the custody account in the past five years. Maybe it means nothing and will soon reverse, but it is possibly also the first warning sign that something has dramatically shifted in this story.
 
Here’s the data. Let’s start with the total amount of custody holdings over the past 20 years.
 

 height=

by Chris Martenson

 style=Around here we like to track things from the outside in, as the initial movements at the periphery tend to give us an early warning of when things might go wrong at the center. It is always the marginal country, weakest stock in a sector, or fringe population that gives us the early warning that trouble is afoot. For example, rising food stamp utilization and poverty levels in the US indicate that economic hardship is progressing from the lower socioeconomic levels up towards the center — that is, from the outside in.

That exact pattern is now playing out in Europe, although arguably the earliest trouble was detected with the severe weakness seen in the eastern European countries nearly two years ago. 

 style=

The Real Contagion Risk
by Chris Martenson

 style=Around here we like to track things from the outside in, as the initial movements at the periphery tend to give us an early warning of when things might go wrong at the center. It is always the marginal country, weakest stock in a sector, or fringe population that gives us the early warning that trouble is afoot. For example, rising food stamp utilization and poverty levels in the US indicate that economic hardship is progressing from the lower socioeconomic levels up towards the center — that is, from the outside in.

That exact pattern is now playing out in Europe, although arguably the earliest trouble was detected with the severe weakness seen in the eastern European countries nearly two years ago. 

 style=

by Gregor Macdonald

What to Expect for Gold in 2012

by Gregor Macdonald
Monday, October 17, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Why economic concerns incent miners to produce less gold
  • Why gold is set to dramatically appreciate further vs. the stock market
  • How the West has sown its discontent by using increasing debt to mask the decline of real wages
  • Predicting the gold price vs. the S&P next year

Part I – Gold and Economic Decline

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – What to Expect for Gold in 2012

As I covered in Part I of this report, Dr. Krugman uses Hotelling rather creatively to explain the strength of gold from an investor’s point of view. I actually think Krugman is also applying a kind of traditional, discounting method of valuation. In essence, he is arguing that because interest rates are so low, the penalty normally associated with holding a non-income-producing asset, like gold or even cash, has evaporated. Indeed, this is the deflationist view, that cash is king because its purchasing power is increasing while the price of goods and services is falling. However, for those of us who prefer gold to cash, we are asking that gold provide additional services by offering protection against instability in the system and maintaining purchasing power more completely over all prices produced by economists and governments, not just price indexes.

But what about gold from the producer’s point of view? Remember, Hotelling says there’s a declining incentive for producers to extract and market their natural resources if the price appreciation taking place in situ (in the ground) is greater than the capital they could earn after having turned those resources into cash. Let’s take a look at more than a century of global gold production, updated with the latest data from the USGS.

What to Expect for Gold in 2012
PREVIEW by Gregor Macdonald

What to Expect for Gold in 2012

by Gregor Macdonald
Monday, October 17, 2011

Executive Summary

  • Why economic concerns incent miners to produce less gold
  • Why gold is set to dramatically appreciate further vs. the stock market
  • How the West has sown its discontent by using increasing debt to mask the decline of real wages
  • Predicting the gold price vs. the S&P next year

Part I – Gold and Economic Decline

If you have not yet read Part I, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.

Part II – What to Expect for Gold in 2012

As I covered in Part I of this report, Dr. Krugman uses Hotelling rather creatively to explain the strength of gold from an investor’s point of view. I actually think Krugman is also applying a kind of traditional, discounting method of valuation. In essence, he is arguing that because interest rates are so low, the penalty normally associated with holding a non-income-producing asset, like gold or even cash, has evaporated. Indeed, this is the deflationist view, that cash is king because its purchasing power is increasing while the price of goods and services is falling. However, for those of us who prefer gold to cash, we are asking that gold provide additional services by offering protection against instability in the system and maintaining purchasing power more completely over all prices produced by economists and governments, not just price indexes.

But what about gold from the producer’s point of view? Remember, Hotelling says there’s a declining incentive for producers to extract and market their natural resources if the price appreciation taking place in situ (in the ground) is greater than the capital they could earn after having turned those resources into cash. Let’s take a look at more than a century of global gold production, updated with the latest data from the USGS.

Total 6302 items

Daily Digest

Please login to submit a story to the Daily Digest.

View Past Daily Digests