This is a continuation of Part 1: Court Blocks OHSA Vaccine Mandate.
In this episode I cover the horrendous and inexcusable efforts to redefine and explain away vaccine injuries, especially in children, as being “mild” or “not that bad.” the efforts by media and some compromised “experts” are as transparently ridiculous as they are morally tragic.
These efforts are being undertaken to nudge everyone in one direction and one direction only; towards being vaccinated. For those who have already made their choice on the matter, these efforts are certain to backfire. Hiding and lying are not good methods of persuasion.
Worse, there is still no real interest in helping people become healthier, nor to assure the public has adequate serum levels of vitamin D, or any interest at all (in fact, the opposite) in promoting early treatments. Add that all up, and it’s clear there’s an agenda running that has nothing to do with public health.
Of course, most of us already know that.
Finally, I work through the logic underlying the bizarre reframing to apply treatments to healthy people vs applying treatments only to sick people. Because that’s what a “vaccine” actually is which neither prevents catching nor spreading a virus, but instead only knocks down the symptoms (for a few months). It’s a treatment, because that’s what treatments do – they knock down symptoms.
Given this, the actual public health calculation should weigh the benefit of treating hundreds of millions of people with a drug with sometimes severe side-effects against the cost of doing not applying the treatment (as long as that involves using other proven early treatments in the course of things).